Complex acquisition negotiations in the chemical industry

House of Boards conducted complex negotiations in the acquisition of a company in the chemicals sector. A challenging process that included various strategic, financial and operational aspects.

Background

Buyer: an international chemical group (X) that wanted to strengthen its presence in the European market Target: a medium-sized family-owned company (Y) that specialized in high-performance chemical products for the pharmaceutical industry Purpose: X wanted to acquire Y to gain access to innovative technologies and an established network of customers in the pharmaceutical sector.  

Phase 1: Preparation and Due Diligence.

1. Strategic considerations
  • Market Analysis: We analyzed the market to evaluate Y’s position, including market share, competitive position and growth potential.
  • Synergy benefits: We identified potential synergies, such as cost savings from economies of scale, and technology transfer.
  • Risk Analysis: We identified risks, such as environmental liabilities and potential legal issues (e.g. patent disputes).
2. Financial Due Diligence
  • Accounting Analysis: We conducted an in-depth assessment of Y’s financial health, including income statement, balance sheet and cash flows.
  • Valuation: We determined the value of Y using multiple methods (e.g., DCF analysis, comparable transactions, market multiples).
3. Operational Due Diligence
  • Production capacity and technology: We assessed production sites, technologies and innovation capacity of Y.
  • Human Resources: We analyzed the workforce and the integration of employees into the larger X.

Phase 2: Negotiation strategy

1. Start of negotiations
  • Bid structure: X made an initial, non-binding bid, focusing on Y’s strategic value.
  • Exclusivity period: X requested an exclusivity period to conduct negotiations without competitors.
2. Interests of the seller
  • Family Interests: Y was a family business.
    The founders wanted the core values and brand to be preserved after the acquisition.
  • Employment: Maintaining jobs for existing employees was a critical issue for Y’s owners.
3. Complexity of negotiations.
  • Cultural differences: Negotiations were affected by differences in corporate culture and decision-making processes between X and Y.
  • Environmental and regulatory issues: Because of strict environmental regulations in the chemical sector, we had to carefully align post-acquisition responsibilities.
  • Price and payment structure: We had discussions about the total acquisition price and whether it would be paid in cash, shares, or a combination of these.

Phase 3: Completion and integration

1. Final agreement
  • Purchase Agreement (SPA): Legal teams from both sides worked on the final purchase agreement, establishing all terms, warranties and indemnities.
  • Regulatory approval: The transaction had to be approved by competition and other regulatory authorities given its impact on the market.
2. Integration Plan
  • Post-Merger Integration (PMI): We drafted a PMI plan that guided the integration of Y into X, focusing on synergies, culture and human resource management.
  • Communication: We established transparent communication with employees, customers, and other stakeholders to ensure the acquisition went smoothly and reduced uncertainty.
3. Evaluation and adaptation
  • Evaluation: Regular evaluation of integration progress, with adjustments where needed to achieve acquisition goals.
  • Optimization: Continuously optimize operations to extract maximum value from the acquisition.

Conclusion: a successful acquisition

House of Boards prepared thoroughly for the acquisition in the chemicals sector. An understanding of the market and the interests of various stakeholders was needed, and the integration strategy had to be well thought out.

The complex negotiations succeeded because we effectively identified, managed and negotiated strategic, financial, legal and cultural challenges. In doing so, we properly identified and challenged the expectations of both parties.

Read our other cases

House of Boards increased the contribution margin (or gross margin) for a manufacturer of prepared meals. We implemented several strategies to do this.
House of Boards conducted a restructuring in a construction company, a complex task that required a systematic approach.
House of Boards set up a joint venture in Asia for a European IT company. This strategic decision required detailed planning and careful execution.